palladio awards
Download Application, Entry Procedures and Requirements
pdf file 40kb
requires Adobe Acrobat
Traditional Building Magazine

Period Homes Magazine

Traditional Building Exhibition and Conference

period homes



www.Traditional-Building.com

Winners of the 2004 Competition

Commercial & Civic Architecture: Restoration & Renovation
WINNER: Joseph K. Oppermann - Architect, P.A.


PROJECT: Restoration of Market Hall, Charleston, SC
ARCHITECT: Joseph K. Oppermann — Architect, P.A., Winston-Salem, NC; Joseph K. Oppermann, FAIA, Principal in Charge
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: NBM Construction Co., Inc., North Charleston, SC


MARKET HALL BROUGHT BACK TO LIFE


Designed by Edward B. White, Charleston, SC’s Market Hall was built in 1841 to anchor the city’s market sheds. The $3.6 million restoration directed by Joseph K. Oppermann – Architect, P.A. has brought the building back to its original condition. The ground floor is now an open market and the second floor houses an updated Civil War museum. Photo: Joseph K. Oppermann – Architect, P.A.

Designed in accordance with the Golden Mean and built in 1841, Market Hall was modeled after the Temple of Nike in Athens. The building has long been considered the masterwork of Charleston’s premiere architect of the mid-19th century, Edward Brickell White, and the handsomely detailed and gracefully proportioned building stands out in a city known for its early architecture and important landmarks.

The two-story building was originally built to form the western terminus of the city’s public market, a series of low, one-story, open-sided brick sheds stretching four blocks from Meeting St., the city’s main commercial thoroughfare, east to the waterfront. North Market St. and South Market St. sit just a few feet from the north and south elevations respectively and Market Hall created a grand entrance to the market from the commercial district. The open ground floor provided space for vendors and offices for the market manager and constable, and the upper level contained a large public meeting hall. Damage from Civil War bombardments, an earthquake in 1886, decades of infrequent maintenance and finally Hurricane Hugo in 1989 had left the building with serious structural cracks and a severely deteriorated façade.

The top floor of Market Hall was leased to the Daughters of the Confederacy in 1899 for a Civil War museum. When the hurricane hit almost a century later in 1989, the museum had to move to temporary quarters. After conducting stabilization, Charleston’s mayor, Joseph P. Riley, Jr., launched a national search in 1992 for a team to conduct the restoration of Market Hall. Joseph K. Oppermann, FAIA, of Winston-Salem, NC, was selected to lead that effort.

The $3.6-million restoration was completed in 2002. The two-story building provides 4,200 sq.ft. of net space. The restored first floor is open for vendors again and the Daughters of the Confederacy now has a state-of-the-art Civil War Museum on the second floor.

Market Hall is the “epitome of illusion in architecture,” says Oppermann. “It was built of inexpensive brick trimmed with brownstone, but then the brick was coated with stucco that was molded and scored to look like large blocks of rusticated brownstone on the ground floor walls and like fine ashlar cut stone on the upper floor level. Tinted limewash was added as a protective coat and to unify the appearance of the “stone” façade. Inside, common pine doors were grained to look like expensive oak and wood mantels were faux painted to look like marble. In addition, a balcony with an oculus above the foyer creates a dramatic entrance, but there are no stairs to the balcony and the balcony doorways lead nowhere.


By the early 1990s, Market Hall had fallen into a state of disrepair and had also suffered structural and surface damage during Hurricane Hugo in 1989. Photo: Joseph K. Oppermann – Architect, P.A

“This project provided a lot of challenges,” Oppermann says. “To start, Charleston is located in an earthquake zone, the site is a former creek bed and the building is constructed of load-bearing masonry, which does not do well in earthquakes. One of the first things we did was to set up monitoring devices to check the cracks that had occurred in the building as a result of an earthquake in 1886. These operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for six months, through one cycle from hot to cold.”

Two major areas of damage to the masonry were discovered and in both locations the cracks extended from below grade all the way through the cornice. The walls were probed to determine the full extent of the cracks. The repair, devised by structural engineer David C. Fischetti, P.E., of Cary, NC, included the replacement of sheared brick and then the placement of stainless-steel serrated rods in the mortar joints to stitch the walls back together. The building was also made more stable by inserting diaphragms at the first floor and attic levels to better tie the walls together. Salem Contracting of Indian Trail, NC, conducted the masonry repairs.

Extensive damage was also discovered in the roof timbers. “The heavy timber trusses in the attic had extensive rot and were full of termites,” Oppermann explains. Fischetti devised repairs that included the removal of damaged sections and the insertion of Dutchman repairs. The framing was repaired by members of the Timber Framers Guild, led by Mike Goldberg of Woodstock, GA, and Peter Bull of Cleveland, GA. Some damaged areas, such as a splintered section of a truss in the attic that had been hit by canon fire during the Civil War, were kept in their found condition. “We left that damage so that there would be tangible evidence of that chapter of the building’s history,” Oppermann says.

For the roof, the architectural team decided to go back to the standing-seam metal roof of the 1840s but used copper instead of reproducing the red painted ferric-based metal roof on the original building. Picquet Roofing of Charleston, SC, installed the roof. “We decided to go with the copper because it requires little maintenance,” Oppermann notes. “In this maritime climate, a ferric-based metal roof would have to be scraped and repainted about every seven years.”

The front steps were another challenge. “Each step was a single, 9-ft.-long block of stone, 12 in. deep and eight in. tall, with no seams,” says Oppermann, “and the treads were badly deteriorated.” Portland Brownstone Quarries of Cheshire, CT, which mines the same vein from which the original stairs came, was able to produce large blocks for consideration. Oppermann went to the quarry and personally marked the narrow sections of each block from which the step would be cut.

The exterior ironwork was cleaned and repaired by Asheville Ironworks of Asheville, NC. A new brass handrail was added at a height to improve accessibility by the handicapped and the existing ironwork was repainted its original bright green color. “This shade of green is actually very typical of the 1840s throughout the country and we have found it on a number of buildings in the Low Country, though most people were surprised when it was identified,” Oppermann says. New copper lanterns, designed to burn gas as did the originals, were built to replace those removed in the late-19th century. Made by John Gant of Charleston, SC, these were based on historical photographs, including a pair taken by Civil War photographer Matthew Brady in 1865 during the Union occupation.

The interior restoration of the building was also extensive. In addition to the consolidation of flat plaster, new sections of plaster details were cast and installed as infill where there were damaged and missing elements. Dutchman repairs were made to the original pine floors and woodwork and original surface colors were identified and reproduced. The decorative painting was executed by Plantation Painters, Inc., of Charleston, SC, and Jim Jacobs of Charleston Woodworks, also of Charleston, was responsible for the interior woodwork. locations.

“For a museum, the environmental conditions were especially challenging,” says Oppermann. “We had to deal with sunlight flooding in from large windows on three elevations, extreme heat in summer and high humidity year-round. The mechanical system had to moderate these conditions for very sensitive collections. A part of the solution included the addition of a thermal window with UV-filtering inside the existing sash of each window. The framing of the new window is configured to align with the stiles and rails of the original triple-hung sash. And each section of the new window is removable to allow maintenance and repair.” The environmental systems were designed by Landmark Facilities Group, Inc., of East Norwalk, CT, and the new thermal windows were constructed by Hope’s Windows of Jamestown, NY.
Of the restoration, Oppermann says: “While a full complement of engineers is important for the restoration effort, as in new design, there are a number of other professions that are essential to a restoration. It is a team effort. Everyone has a critical part in the effort: architect, engineer, historian, archaeologist and conservator.”

The City of Charleston, Joseph K. Oppermann, FAIA, and NBM Construction Co. received the National Preservation Honor Award for the restoration of Market Hall from the National Trust for Historic Preservation in October, 2003. That award stated, in part: “Charleston has long been revered as a model for historic preservation and the painstaking attention to detail in the restoration of Market Hall further illustrates Charleston’s dedication to maintaining its historic landmarks.”

Headed up by Joseph K. Oppermann, FAIA, former Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer for Texas, the firm of Joseph K. Oppermann – Architect, P.A., specializes in the research, analysis, conservation, restoration and retrofitting of historic buildings. Based in Winston-Salem, NC, and founded in 1999, the firm includes a technical staff of three, in addition to Oppermann. The firm offers a full line of traditional basic architectural services as well as special services for historic buildings, such as Historic Structures Reports, Physical Condition Surveys, Record Documents and feasibility studies for historic structures.

See details about the winning entry in the May/June 2004 issue of Traditional Building Magazine.

 
Back to Top

www.Traditional-Building.com
Home | Search Suppliers| Resources | Subscriptions | Advertising
About Us
| SiteMap | Contact Us

www.period-homes.com
Home | Search Suppliers | Resources | Subscriptions | Advertising
About Us
| SiteMap | Contact Us

Copyright 2006 Restore Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.