2006 PALLADIO AWARDS
Restoration & Renovation
WINNER:
EINHORN YAFFEE PRESCOTT ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING, PC
Legislative Beauty
PROJECT: Washington State Legislative Building,
Olympia, WA
ARCHITECT: SRG Partnership, Inc., Seattle, WA; Ralph
Belton, AIA, principal in charge
PRESERVATION ARCHITECT & ENGINEER: Einhorn Yaffee
Prescott, Architecture & Engineering, PC, Albany, NY;
Mark Thaler, AIA, principal in charge
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS: Swenson Say Faget, Seattle,
WA
EXTERIOR STONE CONSULTANT: Wiss, Janney, Elstner
Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: M.A. Mortenson, Bellevue, WA;
Merrill Contractors, Vancouver, WA; Perini Corp.,
Framingham, MA
Designed by Wilder & White of New York City and built
between 1922 and 1928, the Washington State Legislative
Building in Olympia, WA, has been described by Henry Russell
Hitchcock as the “climax” of the American Renaissance of
state capitol construction. It sits on a hilltop overlooking
the southern tip of Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains
and is said to be the state capitol that is closest in
design to the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.
One of the distinguishing features of this grand,
four-story, 300,000-sq.ft. structure is its 287-ft.-tall
central circular drum tower with a dome and cupola, the
fourth tallest masonry dome in the world. “The first three
are St. Peter’s in Rome, St. Paul’s in London and St.
Isaac’s in St. Petersburg, Russia,” says Patricia McLain,
project director, Washington Department of General
Administration.
The brick-and-stone building is adorned with hand-carved
friezes and is the centerpiece of a group of buildings that
make up the capitol. Among the many outstanding features are
the six cast-bronze doors – each weighing five tons and each
bearing a different scene from Washington’s past – that open
into a sumptuous interior. A large chandelier designed and
built by Louis Comfort Tiffany hangs in the central rotunda
and polished marble and decorative plaster are found
throughout the building.
Time had taken a toll on the building and by 1999 it had
fallen into a state of disrepair. The state was planning a
5½-year restoration of the building, which is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places, when the 6.8-magnitude
Nisqually earthquake hit the area on February 28, 2001.
(M.A. Mortenson actually signed documents naming them
contractor/construction manager on that morning.)
The earthquake caused considerable damage, making the
building unsafe. Plaster delaminated, lights fell and the
33-million-lb. dome was actually lifted and rotated, leaving
its unsupported stone columns out of plumb by up to six
inches. Forced to evacuate, lawmakers decided to accelerate
a complete restoration along with seismic upgrades and
earthquake repairs. They also asked for the work to be done
in a shorter timeframe – 2½ years. The complete restoration
included the scope of the work prior to the earthquake plus
earthquake repair.
The $120-million restoration, led by SRG Partnership of
Seattle, WA, and Einhorn Yaffee Prescott, Architecture &
Engineering, PC, (EYP) of Albany, NY, included $16 million
in earthquake repairs and has put the building back in
order, restored its historical integrity and added new
modern systems. “The combination of earthquake repairs with
the restoration and renovation added to the complexity of
the project,” McLain notes. “It was both an opportunity and
a challenge to bring the building up to 21st-century
standards, add access for people with disabilities and
achieve sustainability goals while maintaining the
sensitivity to the historic fabric of the building.
EYP was able to incorporate energy conservation and
sustainability principles and integrate accessibility. When
it was finished, all of the historic elements were
preserved, yet all of the modern amenities are included.”
“The Legislative Building is a truly unique building in
Washington,” says Ralph Belton, AIA, principal in charge,
SRG Partnership. “A 75-year-old building is very old by
Washington standards. The basic challenge was to introduce
up-to-date seismic, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire
sprinkler and communication/data systems into a building
that was built in a time when air conditioning didn’t exist
and when office equipment was a manual typewriter and 40
phones.
“All of this needed to be done without affecting the
historic fabric of the building. The careful insertion of
new systems into the building is the opposite of how we
build new buildings, so it was a challenge to the builders.
We also required trade skills for plaster, painting and
stonework that aren’t widely available. The design of this
project required a much more collaborative process that
included the builders from the beginning.” Throughout the
project, the ornate marble, bronze and oak finishes were
protected and workmen were educated before they were allowed
into the building.
“One of the biggest challenges was getting all of those
systems into the building,” agrees Mark Thaler, AIA,
principal in charge, EYP. “Fortunately, the columns around
the building actually provided a shading factor that cut
down on the needs of the cooling system. Also, there were
some existing pathways that we could utilize.” An
interesting feature of the building is that the original
design took ventilation into consideration. In fact, the
original mechanical systems were “intricately interwoven
into the structure,” according to an article in the
November, 2004, issue of Columbia Magazine, A Legislative
Building Commemorative Issue, by Christopher Tavener of
Einhorn Yaffee Prescott. EYP was able to take advantage of
the original systems when incorporating modern mechanicals.
In addition, more than 12 miles of new hydronic piping
and four miles of new heating ducts were installed behind
walls and in ceilings. Ten miles of new plumbing piping were
tucked behind the walls. Concrete floors were opened so that
more than 1,000 miles of new wiring for computers, phones
and wireless technology could be installed.
Late in the project, it was discovered that some of these
ducts were wrapped in asbestos. Mortenson solved this
problem by lining the ducts with epoxy, rather than removing
the asbestos. Removal would have cost an estimated $2.4
million and would have delayed the project by four months.
At the same time, embedded roof and balcony drains and
piping could not be removed and replaced without causing
significant damage to the historic sandstone façade, so they
were also lined with epoxy to restore them.
In one example of using space wisely, EYP inserted
conduits in the clay tiles in the ceiling instead of
lowering the ceiling. “The clay tiles were hollowed out so
the space could be used for pathways for new fire protection
systems and electrical conduit,” says McLain. “This meant
that the ceilings didn’t have to be lowered to make room for
the conduits. EYP found many ways to fit the new systems
into the existing structure of the building. They were able
to tuck new work into the building so you can’t see it. It’s
seamless.”
Stabilizing the 16 exterior columns at the base of the
dome that had shifted during the earthquake was the first
phase of the project. Because it was impossible to put them
back into position, the architects and engineers devised a
solution that involved drilling 60 ft. through the gutter of
the dome, the center of each column and the base of the dome
to anchor the columns. Hollow, reinforcing steel was
inserted into these holes and more than one million pounds
of concrete were pumped in to tie the dome, columns and base
together.
In addition, fiber wrap was placed behind ornamental
marble paneled walls to keep them from delaminating and any
damaged stonework, masonry or plaster finishes were either
replaced or repaired. The building is now reinforced to
withstand an earthquake with a magnitude of up to 8.2.
“We all collaborated on how to strengthen the building,”
says Belton. “Mike Wright, the engineer with Swenson Say
Faget [Seattle, WA] modeled the building on the computer,
using finite element analysis, and he told us the columns
needed to be pinned in place. So we brainstormed and came up
with the idea of drilling the columns and adding cement and
then we found someone who had experience with that kind of
drilling.” During the drilling, the architects and engineers
noticed that water and brick dust was pouring out of the
holes. To solve this problem, grout was poured into the
holes whenever they reached a joint. This sealed the leak
and they were able to drill through the grout. “It was
interesting,” he adds. “Many people worked together to make
this work.”
The building also needed an egress route that met code
requirements. Instead of adding new stairways, EYP improved
and protected the existing egress system by enclosing the
north rotunda stairs in a fire-resistant glass and bronze
wall. This solution maintains the visual openness of the
stairway while also providing safe exit in case of a fire.
“After we had a timed-egress study done by Rolf Jensen &
Associates of Chicago, we took two stairwells that were
unenclosed and provided glass enclosures,” says Thaler.
“They are fire-rated glass in bronze-finished steel
structures. This kept the openness of the stairs and created
a fire-rated egress that would bring people all the way
through the building.”
Securing the five-ton “Angels of Mercy” Tiffany
chandelier posed another problem. Originally the engineer
recommended steel cable to reinforce the 101-ft.-long chain
holding the chandelier 25 ft. above the rotunda. However,
they realized that a typical steel safety cable wasn’t
pliable enough to be woven into the original chain. The
engineer, Mike Wright, an avid sailor and ship builder,
recommended kevlar rope, the same material used in sailboat
rigging, and this proved to be both strong enough and
flexible enough to hold the chandelier without being
obtrusive. In fact, it worked so well that kevlar rope was
used to secure all of the major chandeliers in the building.
A number of specialty contractors were brought in to work
on the project, including Master Millwork of Puyullup, WA;
Architectural Grille of Brooklyn, NY, and Architectural
Reproductions of Seattle, WA. Pioneer Masonry Restoration of
Seattle, WA, repaired the exterior stone; Western Tile and
Marble, Bellevue, WA, repaired the interior stone work, and
D. L. Henricksen, Tacoma, WA, repaired the extensive plaster
damage. The decorative painting was restored by EverGreene
Painting Studios, Oak Park, IL.
This project became the first state building in the
country to apply LEED standards to the preservation of a
state capitol. The design team documented the challenges of
applying LEED standards to historic preservation and met
with the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) in Washington,
DC, to encourage the development of specific standards for
historic preservation. The primary focus of these efforts
included reusing the existing building, improved energy
efficiency and recycling building materials. For example,
Alaska Tokeen marble salvaged from the renovation of Smith
Tower in Seattle, WA, (once the tallest building west of the
Mississippi) was used to replace marble damaged by the
earthquake in the legislative building. In addition, 85% of
the construction waste, more than 8,000 tons of demolished
material, including wood, concrete, paper, bricks, dirt,
metal and drywall, were recycled. “Typically, 25% is
recycled or reused,” says McLain. “In other instances, EYP
and Western harvested marble from one room and used it in
another.”
Another energy-conservation facet of the project was the
addition of energy-efficient lighting, compact fluorescent
lamps that last eight to ten times longer than conventional
light bulbs. In addition, photovoltaic cells were
incorporated into the rooftop. They generate enough
electricity to light the dome at night. “This is the largest
array of photovoltaic cells on any state capitol in the
country,” Thaler notes. “It was installed so it is only
visible from the air.”
“It’s even larger than the array of photovoltaic cells on
the White House,” McLain adds, “and it’s totally integrated
into the building facade. We wanted to show people that it
is possible to use solar energy on an historic building, to
be a model for others.”
One change in the floor plan was opening up some of the
areas on the first floor. “This transformed what people
called the basement into a lighter, more open space and
provided much-needed public gathering space,” says Belton,
“including an area for visiting school children.
”Essentially, the building was taken apart, and
infrastructure, safety and security issues were resolved.
Then as it was put back together, historic materials were
restored or repaired. “Everyone felt indebted to the
original architects,” says McLain. “They left us a
magnificent building and they set high standards of
craftsmanship. All of the workers were inspired by their
work and rose to the occasion.”
“The building has a vintage look with high-tech equipment
just below the surface,” Belton adds. The restored landmark
reopened to the public in December of 2004 and is once again
a source of pride for the citizens of the state. – Martha
McDonald